{"id":1405,"date":"2026-08-26T18:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-26T17:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/?p=1405"},"modified":"2026-08-26T18:00:00","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T17:00:00","slug":"physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/","title":{"rendered":"Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I am tired of ordinary controls being moved onto glossy touch panels. A physical button may look less futuristic in a product photo, but it tells you where it is, whether you pressed it, and often what it will do before the device has even powered up. That is a very good interface for something you use every day.<\/p>\n<p>Touch controls are fine when the available actions genuinely change with context. A phone screen needs that flexibility. A lamp, cooker, car heater, pair of headphones, or coffee machine usually does not. Replacing a familiar switch with an unlabelled capacitive patch saves visible clutter while moving the confusion into the person using it.<\/p>\n<p>The worst versions fail silently. Wet fingers, gloves, poor lighting, lag, or a frozen interface can turn a simple adjustment into repeated tapping and guesswork. A decent button gives tactile feedback and can be found without staring at it. A rotary control is even better when the task is moving through a range, because its position and movement communicate something useful.<\/p>\n<p>I do not want every gadget to look like industrial equipment from 1987. I just want designers to stop treating the absence of controls as proof of good design. If a function is common, important, and always available, give it a real button. Clean glass is not worth making the product more annoying.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Touch controls look clean in product photos, but physical buttons remain faster, clearer, and easier to trust.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[14],"tags":[233,187,232,234],"class_list":["post-1405","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-random-stuff","tag-design","tag-gadgets","tag-physical-buttons","tag-touchscreens"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls - wade.one<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls - wade.one\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Touch controls look clean in product photos, but physical buttons remain faster, clearer, and easier to trust.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"wade.one\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-26T17:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/Wade-Logo-cropped.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1518\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1506\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@wadewomersley\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@wadewomersley\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/26\\\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/26\\\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\",\"@id\":\"\"},\"headline\":\"Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-26T17:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/26\\\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":233,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8b4739f8f8bb2cff5d792d4b8779fcc3\"},\"keywords\":[\"design\",\"gadgets\",\"physical-buttons\",\"touchscreens\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Random Stuff\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/26\\\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/26\\\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\\\/\",\"name\":\"Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls - wade.one\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-26T17:00:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/26\\\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/26\\\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/26\\\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"wade.one\",\"description\":\"wade womersley - york based software engineer\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8b4739f8f8bb2cff5d792d4b8779fcc3\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8b4739f8f8bb2cff5d792d4b8779fcc3\",\"name\":\"Wade Womersley\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/02\\\/200px.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/02\\\/200px.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/02\\\/200px.png\",\"width\":202,\"height\":200,\"caption\":\"Wade Womersley\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/wade.one\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/02\\\/200px.png\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls - wade.one","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls - wade.one","og_description":"Touch controls look clean in product photos, but physical buttons remain faster, clearer, and easier to trust.","og_url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/","og_site_name":"wade.one","article_published_time":"2026-08-26T17:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1518,"height":1506,"url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/Wade-Logo-cropped.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@wadewomersley","twitter_site":"@wadewomersley","twitter_misc":{"Estimated reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/"},"author":{"name":"","@id":""},"headline":"Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls","datePublished":"2026-08-26T17:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/"},"wordCount":233,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8b4739f8f8bb2cff5d792d4b8779fcc3"},"keywords":["design","gadgets","physical-buttons","touchscreens"],"articleSection":["Random Stuff"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/","url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/","name":"Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls - wade.one","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-08-26T17:00:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/26\/physical-buttons-are-still-better-than-touch-controls\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Physical Buttons Are Still Better Than Touch Controls"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/","name":"wade.one","description":"wade womersley - york based software engineer","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8b4739f8f8bb2cff5d792d4b8779fcc3"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8b4739f8f8bb2cff5d792d4b8779fcc3","name":"Wade Womersley","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/200px.png","url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/200px.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/200px.png","width":202,"height":200,"caption":"Wade Womersley"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/200px.png"}}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1407,"url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/08\/16\/every-hotel-room-has-one-light-switch-nobody-understands\/","url_meta":{"origin":1405,"position":0},"title":"Every Hotel Room Has One Light Switch Nobody Understands","author":"","date":"August 16, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Hotel rooms turn switching off the lights into a puzzle that nobody asked to solve before bed.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Random Stuff&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Random Stuff","link":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/category\/random-stuff\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1350,"url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/06\/05\/the-dreamcast-vmu-was-ridiculous-in-exactly-the-right-way\/","url_meta":{"origin":1405,"position":1},"title":"The Dreamcast VMU Was Ridiculous in Exactly the Right Way","author":"","date":"June 5, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Dreamcast VMU was a tiny memory card with ideas above its station, which is exactly why I still like it.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Gaming&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Gaming","link":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/category\/gaming\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":764,"url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2015\/02\/07\/standardising-logging-and-parallelisation-in-multiple-languages\/","url_meta":{"origin":1405,"position":2},"title":"Standardising logging and parallelisation in multiple languages","author":"Wade","date":"February 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Over the last few days I've been working on interfaces to use across multiple programming languages to standardise how some things are done. This stemmed from a requirement to allow processing to be dealt with in any language from any other language. People do this all the time, it's nothing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Programming&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Programming","link":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/category\/programming\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/source-code-583537_640.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/source-code-583537_640.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/source-code-583537_640.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":139,"url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2009\/09\/25\/copenhagen-user-experience\/","url_meta":{"origin":1405,"position":3},"title":"Copenhagen User Experience","author":"Wade","date":"September 25, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"I'm torn on this, it has some great ideas (updating interface with dynamic search - real time search Ben?) and it has some big failings (updating interface with resizing objects.)For example, the login screen, rarely seen but those little changes with the moving\/scaling image is a great idea; the live\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Software&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Software","link":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/category\/software\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1329,"url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2026\/06\/02\/github-copilot-coding-agent-needs-workflow-rules-not-just-access\/","url_meta":{"origin":1405,"position":4},"title":"GitHub Copilot Coding Agent Needs Workflow Rules, Not Just Access","author":"Wade","date":"June 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"GitHub Copilot's coding agent is useful, but I would want explicit workflow rules around permissions, networking, and review before giving it real access.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;AI&quot;","block_context":{"text":"AI","link":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/category\/ai\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":521,"url":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/2011\/03\/04\/using-ssl-in-restclient\/","url_meta":{"origin":1405,"position":5},"title":"Using SSL in RestClient","author":"Wade","date":"March 4, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"UPDATE 14\/07\/2012: The author of the client has released version 2.5 a short while ago and also a video for using self-signed certificates in the client. RESTClient is a great little CLI and GUI tool for testing your REST API. I recently pushed a new API up in the office\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Programming&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Programming","link":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/category\/programming\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1405","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1405"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1405\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1428,"href":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1405\/revisions\/1428"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1405"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1405"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wade.one\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1405"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}